December 18, 2008 • 7:31 pm
Commentators, participants, and historians have suggested connections between the media and the political movements of the 1960s and their interactions that allowed activists to communicate their agendas. By utilizing media coverage of the Trail of Broken Treaties and ensuing occupation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1972 by the American Indian Movement, Indian activists secured a medium in which to voice their goals. The study of the relationship between mass media and the protest movements is important, historian Julia Bond has argued, because “until historians unravel the complex links between the southern freedom struggle and the mass media, their understanding of how the Movement functioned, why it succeeded, and when and where it failed, will be incomplete.” Bond’s declaration can be extended to other movements of the 1960s and 1970s that utilized mass media to their advantage.
The American Indian Movement forcefully inserted their agenda into public discourse and used the print medium to insert their voice into public policy debates. What sort of things were activists talking to the media about? What was the media reporting? Omitting? What was AIM’s message? Did the media report the demonstrator’s goals or was the message lost in the sensationalism of the occupation? Was the occupation of the BIA a successful strategy for disseminating their agenda? Framing Red Power analyzes the ways newspapers covered the American Indian Movement by bringing together digital technologies and traditional historiographical methodologies, allowing historians to pose new questions about the interaction between media sources and political actors.
Read the rest of this entry »
Filed under: Research, Scholarship, Digital History, Digital Scholarship, Text Encoding, Textual Analysis, TokenX, Word Cloud
December 11, 2008 • 9:30 am
The Journal of American History launched their podcast, “JAHcast,” this week. Their initial podcast features John Nieto-Phillips speaking with James Meriwether about his article, “‘Worth a Lot of Negro Votes’: Black Voters, Africa, and the 1960 Presidential Campaign.” This is a good first step for the journal to provide open access to research — I’d love to see JAH add panels from their annual meetings and other discussions to their podcasting service rather than center the show on a single article. But it’s good to see the journal engaging new digital technologies.
(Thanks: Dan Cohen)
Filed under: History, Podcasts, History, Journal, Podcasts
December 9, 2008 • 6:35 pm
I’ve neglected to point out that our good friend Andrew Torget and the crew at the Digital Scholarship Lab at the University of Richmond partnered up with Google Earth and created map overlays to analyze state and county voting results from 1980 through 2004. The Voting America map also includes demographic information from the U.S. Census that allows users to get a county-level look at how populations voted over time. The collaboration builds upon the DSL’s Voting America: United States Politics, 1840-2004, which explores the last 164 presidential elections through cinematic and interactive maps.
Filed under: Research, Tools, Digital History, Elections, Google Earth, Political History, Voting
December 9, 2008 • 3:10 pm
We’ve added a page of digital history readings that we’ll keep updated as books come across our desks. I thought it might make a useful resource for readers interested in learning more about history in the digital. If you’re into the fabrication side of things, Bill Turkel has posted some light winter reading for digital humanist makers.
Filed under: Books
December 9, 2008 • 3:04 pm
Seeing as how this blog deals with technology and history, I thought it appropriate to point out that the humble mouse turned forty today.
Filed under: News, History, Technology